How To
Fix The United Nations
Copyright
© 2005 Tim Daneliuk (musings@tundraware.com).
Permission to freely reproduce this material is hereby granted so long
as this material is reproduced in its entirety (including this
Copyright notice). Such reproduction is only permitted when there
is no remuneration involved. Excerpting and quoting material
herein is also permitted so long as a citation to the original source
and authorship is included.
OK, I'll admit it. For the
longest time I've had this antipathy towards the United Nations.
It seems to me that the UN accomplishes little, spends a great deal of
(Western) money doing so, and gives far more voice to anti-democractic
tin pot dictatorships than it does the civilized nations of the world.
Not too long ago, an acquaintance of mine changed my mind. He
pointed out that, no matter how ineffectual, stupid, and maddening the
UN was on the whole, it still serves an important function: It
gives nations of all sizes and status a place to holler at each other
and thereby reduces the tendency for them to go to
war. It also provides some framework for defining
international law. This too helps stabilize inter-nation conflict.
I have to admit he had a point. If you look at the wars of the
last couple of decades, the worst of them have been among tribal and/or
religious groups that have no national identity and thus no UN
representation. Among UN members there is sometimes significant
violence, but it is tiny by comparsion. Even something like the
recent Iraq war - even counting the civilian dead - does not remotely
compare with, say, the tribal wars in Africa among the Tutsis and
Hutus. In effect, he was saying that a broken UN is better
than no UN ... and I had to grudgingly concede his point.
But, this doesn't mean we can't improve the United Nations - an
organization rife with corruption, waste, and general nicompoop-like
behavior. I have an idea I think will help. I am convinced
that the
biggest problem with the UN is that, for most of its membership,
getting
to work there is a boondoggle in New York City. Think about
it. You're
freezing your keester off somewhere in Northern Russia or roasting in
sub-Saharan Africa and you get an all-expenses paid trip to NYC for a
few
years. Would you go? Yup, in a New York Minute!
So, what we need to do is provide some mechanism that ensures the
people going to the United Nations are there for the Right Reasons
instead of just going to shop on 5th Avenue. And I know just how
to do this. Let's move the UN where there are no other
distractions. I personally favor Adak, Alaska out on the
end of the Aleutian Chain. Adak is perfect. It has
excellent infrastructure - the US military has had a base there for
decades. It is (really) remote which makes security much
easier. It's set in an absolutely gorgeous natural area. You can
actually see just how gorgeous the couple of days a year it doesn't
rain or snow. But most of all, there's nothing else to do!
As
anyone whose been to Adak can attest, only people with a serious
mission would ever go there voluntarily. The military
mostly had to order people to go there - I am fairly confident there
were few, if any, Adak "volunteers".
In one act we could change the face of the UN. It's participants
could be pretty much be counted upon to be in Adak for the Right
Reasons. We'd free up some primo real estate in New York City
for more useful applications. The cost of running the UN, even
with the increased travel and housing costs, would plummet. (You have
to
be prepared to stay longer than you expected in Adak because of the
weather, but Quonset Huts are cheap to build).
I'm certain we can get Alaskan political and popular support.
After all, Don Young, Alaska's representative in the US House, is
notorious for his porkbarrel plundering of the Federal
treasury. I'm sure he'd leap at the chance to further
cement his reputation as a Congressional Big Spender in moving the
United Nations to Alaska. Moreover, there is not today (as best I
know) a 7-11, Dunkin Donuts, Walmart, or Sears in Adak. But
there would be within minutes of the United Nations opening its doors
there. This would be quickly followed, no doubt, by Saks,
Bloomingdales, Burberry, and Dunhill. The salutary effect on the
Alaskan
economy would sell the project instantly. So, yes, there would be
shopping, but it wouldn't quite be like NYC.
But most importantly, to the degree humanly possible, we'd see Peace In
Our Time. One 18 month stint in Adak would convince most career
diplomats - who think a small limousine is a terrible inconvenience -
to
a) Make peace and go home or b) Just go home and
send some other poor schnook in their place. Either way,
every con arist, carpetbagger, political hanger on, or other
international miscreant wouldn't be banging on the door trying to get
into the "Northern" UN.
The image of Kofi Anon trying to scam money out of the Oil-For-Food
program while freezing his buns off bundled up in 23 layers of clothing
reduces me to giggles. This, my friends, it an Idea Whose
Time Has Come! The United Nations belongs in Adak.
P.S. There is one small problem with this plan. If
implemented, all the cab drivers around the new United Nations would
probably speak English.